- ACADEMICS DEVONTHINK PRO UPDATE
- ACADEMICS DEVONTHINK PRO SOFTWARE
- ACADEMICS DEVONTHINK PRO PROFESSIONAL
Extracting the database from any reference management app loses information (like groups, subgroups etc). I have been burnt too many times in the past by getting locked in apps, that I cannot rely on creating my databases within any proprietary app system. Additionally the search function is unreliable (it doesn’t give the same results when searching pubmed in the native website vs from within bookends). However I found it’s UI too annoying to work with. I'm happy with Bookends and I'd find life a lot more difficult if I was managing large numbers of documents myself and manually creating bibliographies!īookends is a legit option. "slick"), and their current iOS version is much better than Sente's iOS version was. The GUI and some of the other features are still not as good as Sente was, but Bookends is probably more powerful than Sente (a simplistic comparison would be power user vs.
Bookends has some very capable features and the developers are extremely responsive. Bookends has been around for many years (longer than Sente and others) and I wanted something that would hopefully remain in business, as much as we can try to predict the future! Also, I was looking to make sure any app I invested in would also let me jump ship again if I needed to, so the ability to export libraries in common formats was important for me too. In the end, I opted for Bookends, which has both macOS and iOS versions. I looked at EndNote again, Mendeley, Zotero, Papers, ReadCube, and others. The developers seemingly gave their customers no official warning, disappeared, and left their customers hanging (and discussing amongst themselves to work out what was going on), something which I still think was disgraceful.
Unfortunately, the developers began scaling back their support on the forums and then, one day, stopped responding and the server, using to sync between different devices, was taken offline.
ACADEMICS DEVONTHINK PRO SOFTWARE
In my view, this was the best reference management software I worked with and other companies were later adding capabilities similar to Sente's. Sente was excellent, both in terms of its GUI and its capabilities. I primarily used this on OS X, but they also created an iOS version, so I began using both. This happened a few times, so I did some searching and jumped ship!
ACADEMICS DEVONTHINK PRO UPDATE
I stuck with a few updates, but I kept finding the software would "break" when there was an OS update, an update to Word, or the like and then the developers would offer a workaround rather than a fix, with the full fix coming in a paid upgrade. Other tools which were not designed for this purpose might be workable, but I suspect they will not perform as well when it comes to organization and management of bibliographies. thousands) of research papers, presentations, theses, and other documents, I've used specialist reference management software. It's like comparing a home espresso machine with the customizable beasts they have in real coffee shops.įor managing large numbers (e.g.
ACADEMICS DEVONTHINK PRO PROFESSIONAL
Documents by Readdle is a lovely little app but it's not the same thing as an academic professional tool. Academic reference managers can filter and sort by date, authors, subjects, journals, keywords, they can automatically fetch new articles from academic search engines, they handle citations in some word processors via plug ins.
There is a difference between storing a few dozen pdfs for fun and an academic research collection extending over thousands of PDFs. Including how disappointed people were when they bought the good old Mendeley. Do a quick google search and you'll find the whole history. I am in the mood for wild similes today.Īnyway, this was just one of the reason university libraries used to hate Elsevier's guts. (like saying: you need a toothbrush (price: $5), but you can only buy it in a bundle with toothbrushes for cats, dogs and every animal species (price: $5 each) for a total bundle price of $500). filled with junk, non-peer reviewed) journals, and then forcing university libraries to purchase access to the real, reputable journals only via an expensive bundle with many of those fake journals. Among the dirtiest tricks they used to play, is creating a bunch of "fake" (ie. Mendeley in particular had the misfortune of being acquired by Elsevier, which out of all the giant publishers had the reputation of being the most evil. Except for Sente, which went bust (or anyway died off) and Zotero, which remains independent to this day. Then they were bought up, all of them, by big publishing giants. Same for Papers, they were PhD students in the Netherlands who hated Endnote for its general crappiness and high price. Mendeley used to be a neat bunch of folks. Because of the companies that acquired them.
0 kommentar(er)
